Where did I say probable cause meant guilty ? Everyone arrested and held for trial are there because there was probable cause and presumed innocent . Up until the verdict is handed down everyone ( unless they confess) is to be presumed innocent . It is legal to arrest and hold innocent people in jail until bond or trial as long as there is probable cause . If you had reread all my posts you would know I have continuity emphasized there had to be enough evidence of wrong doings to fit the probable cause criteria .
Sent from my Moto E (4) using Tapatalk
Here's what you must decide. Does probable cause mean the person is guilty? If it does not, you can say he is accused of acting outside of the scope of his duties but you cannot say he did act outside the scope of his duties until he is convicted.
And once again, you have not address why the current laws on the books are insufficient to the point that new laws are needed.
Sent from my Moto E (4) using Tapatalk