To be fair; he hit what he shot at.Why is no one making assumptions about this guys training level yet? He put his self In that situation voluntarily instead of calling the police and letting them handle it.
sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
To be fair; he hit what he shot at.Why is no one making assumptions about this guys training level yet? He put his self In that situation voluntarily instead of calling the police and letting them handle it.
sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
To be fair; he hit what he shot at.
To be fair; he hit what he shot at.
Thanks for trying out. See post #13.
Don't forget your free t-shirt at the door for participating.
To be fair; he hit what he shot at.
Seemed like the victim-complex group didn't get it the first time, I guess.
he was negligent. plain and simple. how are you going to perceive a 72 yr old man as a threat? i seriously doubt he was running towards him....more like a shuffle if anything.
Well then that brings in criminal intent right? This wasn't an accident? He aimed and hit his target.
And the Sherriff said the shooter clearly felt his life was threatened.....so I don't understand your comment? Are you, a leo, advising people not to hit their target when they feel their life is threatened?
I'd like to know exactly what the old man was doing when the shooter was calling out instructions to him. Was he just standing there w hands by his side? Was he continuing to move forward? Was he saying anything?
We'll never know if we know the real truth. Guy should have stayed in his freaking house. Sherriff said the shooter broke no laws, and clearly felt his life was threatened. I'm not sure what their options are as far as charging the shooter.
Feeling your life is threatened isn't as simple as saying you feel your life is threatened. I, as an LEO, am saying that you can't shoot someone and say "I felt my life was threatened" and expect it to end at that.
If a elderly man with alzheimers was so scary that he required deadly force to deal with then your world is far too scary.
I'm not saying it should end at that either....he has to have substance to back up his claim.
Same could be said for cops who shoot small dogs lol
But who's to say at 4am, in the low-light or dark that he knew the man was 72?
The problem is when you leave the light of your house to go play stick up in the dark yard, you now have almost thrown your self defense claim out the window. A lot will hinge upon the laws of his state.
Those little ankle biting bastards hurt man.
If self defense is thrown out the window b/c you leave your house (not sure why that would be the case), then this case could get interesting.
lol