FishingBack
Slave to Society
- Jun 30, 2009
- 768
- 16
The Atlantic Monthly has just released the text of a bill introduced by Sen McCain (R-AZ), which, if passed, would allow the
President or his minions to label individual U.S. CITIZENS ON U.S. SOIL as 'high value detainees' and 'unprivileged enemy combatants' in the 'war on terrors' " if he/she:
(1) poses a threat of an attack on civilians or civilian facilities within the U.S. or U.S. facilities abroad;
(2) poses a threat to U.S. military personnel or U.S. military facilities;
(3) potential intelligence value;
(4) is a member of al Qaeda or a terrorist group affiliated with al Qaeda or
(5) such other matters as the President considers appropriate."[/B]
Note that no actual crime is required to have been committed.
Once labelled as such, the individual would not receive miranda warnings, not be allowed access to the courts, and could be held and interrogated indefinitely without judicial oversight.
The sponsor, and all 8 cosponsors of this bill are Republicans.
The article is here.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...n-bill-you-ought-to-read-more-carefully/37116
The text of the proposed law is here.
http://assets.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/politics/ARM10090.pdf
President or his minions to label individual U.S. CITIZENS ON U.S. SOIL as 'high value detainees' and 'unprivileged enemy combatants' in the 'war on terrors' " if he/she:
(1) poses a threat of an attack on civilians or civilian facilities within the U.S. or U.S. facilities abroad;
(2) poses a threat to U.S. military personnel or U.S. military facilities;
(3) potential intelligence value;
(4) is a member of al Qaeda or a terrorist group affiliated with al Qaeda or
(5) such other matters as the President considers appropriate."[/B]
Note that no actual crime is required to have been committed.
Once labelled as such, the individual would not receive miranda warnings, not be allowed access to the courts, and could be held and interrogated indefinitely without judicial oversight.
The sponsor, and all 8 cosponsors of this bill are Republicans.
The article is here.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...n-bill-you-ought-to-read-more-carefully/37116
The text of the proposed law is here.
http://assets.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/politics/ARM10090.pdf
Last edited: