Radar Detectors - do they work?
- Thread starter Jester
- Start date
The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
No need to lock in speed
MOTOR51
Does the machine "do it for you", or do you just look up, see the number, and that's all that matters? I only have experience with the K15, and no LE training with it.
Remove X-band, turnoff PoP, and turn ON K Guard.
That will make the V1 very quiet without hurting its effectiveness at all, in my experience.
Program it for him or it will drive him crazy. It literally is night/day different in how you appreciate it when you correctly program the thing.
I'm not impressed.
Show me a certificate, T-shirt, and a bumpersticker and I'll take you seriously.
You have my blessing just as long as it doesn't conflict with the upcoming "Defensive Vehicle Driving & Assault" seminar I will be teaching in August.
Definitely will do!
If they don't yet they really need to make a radar gun that measures distance between two cars.
As an insurance agent I've read quite a few accident reports over the years. I can count on one hand the number of accidents that listed a cause or even a contributing factor as speed. Following too close comes up in quite a few. I know the argument about officers not witnessing the speeding butits not the velocity that caused the accident, its the inability to stop in time. Speeding tickets cause people to slow down for a certain amount of time after getting one (go read up on public executions if you don't understand what I mean). It also causes people to slow down where they are likely to encounter an officer, not where they are most at risk of getting into an accident, which is what this is supposed to be about (if it were only about revenue then start inspecting mattresses for tags, garage sales without permits, etc). Teach people to allow enough space behind the car in front, that will reduce accidents. Not to mention out insurance rates!
As an insurance agent I've read quite a few accident reports over the years. I can count on one hand the number of accidents that listed a cause or even a contributing factor as speed. Following too close comes up in quite a few. I know the argument about officers not witnessing the speeding butits not the velocity that caused the accident, its the inability to stop in time. Speeding tickets cause people to slow down for a certain amount of time after getting one (go read up on public executions if you don't understand what I mean). It also causes people to slow down where they are likely to encounter an officer, not where they are most at risk of getting into an accident, which is what this is supposed to be about (if it were only about revenue then start inspecting mattresses for tags, garage sales without permits, etc). Teach people to allow enough space behind the car in front, that will reduce accidents. Not to mention out insurance rates!
yeah, I understand you don't have some wierd right to demand to see it. I've only had an officer lie once in the 3 speeding tickets I've gotten, the last almost 4 years ago...and I thanked him for it. I was just curious how the machine worked, being as mine locked.
Mother of God.
Orgazmo. Ftw.
I thought I was the only one who's seen, "I'm the T-Rex!" And "stuntcock!"
Suburbazine
01001000 01101001 0011111
So now I know who to contact when I want to use the State Police track, eh? I wouldn't mind practicing a bit to demonstrate my professional skills as an
Last edited:
You would love to be able to say you associate with us.
JR1572
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Can I get a group photo to prove it?
Surely I have no idea what you are talking about. Here at Vermiform Tactical, we take "Defensive Vehicle Driving & Assault" seriously. Frankly D.V.D.A. is hard work. The bulk of the seminar is logistics, but there are some theatrics involved too. For D.V.D.A. I have had to employ 4 professional "Drivers" that obviously have to have some acting ability as well. Right now my biggest hurdle is finding a host. Our D.V.D.A. sessions have all been hosted by females because traditionally they are at the center of our curriculum. Morality is a huge problem. Due to the extreme and unorthodox nature of D.V.D.A. it has become increasingly more difficult to secure a host that doesn't have loose morals. It is understandable though because reputations are at stake and a host could easily incur extreme property damage if amateur drivers were employed. Our last host had her reputation questioned after one of our Advanced Tactical Maneuvering seminars. Apparently some of our competition thought A.T.M. was too unorthodox and implied that our host had bad taste.
Staff online
-
340six-Global Mod- -
thperez1972ESSAYONS
Members online
- Gmac
- MilOperator
- Markrobichaux
- N4sir
- Jiggy205
- CJB1911
- T-boy
- 340six
- JBP55
- sailem
- thperez1972
- Musicmasterd12
- OEN
- Martman300
- lesgeaux
- Love2shoot
- gwpercle
- mikemule
- nolawis
- Mel633
- stag0608
- cbecnel
- Dav1d
- critta
- guardcore80
- do2gomike
- theway109
- Bigboi
- GBMustangGT
- success
- Sodoodle
- twinin
- Gatordude
- kpm
- davidd
- jstone0336
- 356tsw
- Jerikeaux
- Bam Bam
- larryp44
- Rodog
- Easyt
- La26
- BladeZealot
- hotbiggun
- xring100
- rkp3194
- Bigchillin83
- Jstudz220
- m1k3
