I'm as pro LEO as anybody . I was even one of those useless reserve officers that MOTOR51 despises so much . But if a LEO did the same thing to me as the op described , I'd be pissed too .This is the only gun forum I am on that has a weekly anti LEO thread.
I'm as pro LEO as anybody . I was even one of those useless reserve officers that MOTOR51 despises so much . But if a LEO did the same thing to me as the op described , I'd be pissed too .
I'm as pro LEO as anybody . I was even one of those useless reserve officers that MOTOR51 despises so much . But if a LEO did the same thing to me as the op described , I'd be pissed too .
Huh , reminds me of a story . A certain female officer asked to take a day off . Sgt. Don Crouch told her no . not enough people . I piped up and said that I would come in and work for her . He started bitching at me saying that " reseve officers are not here to replace regular officers , and we needed to get out on the street ". What a dickhead he was .I knew that was coming,lol. I never said reserves were useless, I said that my experience with some of the ones I dealt with wanted to only work @LSU area. We were told that we couldn't take off work due to being short on my squad but if we could get reserves to fill in we could have off. I never got one reserve to work but would here them on the other districts because they were allowed to do as they pleased. If the reserves are set up to be support for full time then they would be great. Maybe you were one of the ones that used to work where he was needed, if so then that does not apply to your reserve service.
Maybe his prescription needs updating, and I'm not joking. Last time I broke a pair of glasses and was working without, it was pretty difficult to differentiate some letters at distance, and reading expiration stickers was impossible.
And before anyone goes there, I've qualified POST numerous times without glasses on. I don't wear Coke-bottles, letters and such just get fuzzy and blend at a distance without my specs.
This is the only gun forum I am on that has a weekly anti LEO thread.
I read the 33 posts by the Op. in this thread and I will keep my thoughts to myself.
School buses are actually the safest and most regulated vehicles on the road. The seats are designed for body impacts with each level of it geared for a different part of the body. This is the reason it is important for passengers to sit correctly in the seats. There is also a roll cage like every 24" throughout the bus. The seats have not been high enough for the placement of shoulder belts and only having lap belts causes many more injuries. Federal regulations recently dictated that bus seats to be 6" higher than they have been to allow placement of shoulder belts. The problem with this is the driver will not be able to see over the seat backs, blocking kids from the view and the rear window making it harder to drive. They are possibly planning to add cameras to offset this.Is it okay for LEOs to have illegal tint on personal vehicles? I know several personally who have dark tint and tinted windshields, entire windshield tinted. How come school buses don't have seat belts? While we are on this kick about stupid laws and double standards for LEOs. Why do LEOs let other LEOs break the law or turn a blind eye to minor infractions? Would I get the same treatment with a reserve commission?
Oh and by the way I haven't paid a ticket in the last six years, when you got pull you just take the ticket.
Then he should have been banging some chick on the hood of a car.
Why not just pull the car over instead of putting us both at risk, if he wanted to run the plates? Yeah, it would have inconvenienced me, but it's his job and as long as he was polite, I would have had nothing poor to say or think about him pulling me over, checking to see if I was sober, had a DL, insurance, etc.