Gator 45/70
Well-Known Member
A bit of food for thought http://www.skilledsurvival.com/survivalists-guide-hiding-guns/
A bit of food for thought http://www.skilledsurvival.com/survivalists-guide-hiding-guns/
What about the email from BS saying you got a message. Those last a little longer
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
or what Dave might be saying is, just because there’s proof out there that you bought a gun at some point, does not mean you would ever be considered a gun owner if you can say you sold it. So there’s no way you could wind up on a list of gun owners.
They are hardcore liberals,I believe they are making files on everyone on the gun boards,What they have and brag about,Things like that
Trying to figure out a liberal is harder than trying to figure out a woman, Women are only crazy for 4/5 days a month,Then they calm down around age 50 or so
Liberals are 24/7 Karen's,
Bat $hit crazy control freak's.
That's already been covered by me and ignored by you.
At what single location is all the info stored?
Wait...is it already stored, is it in the process of being stored, or do they just have the ability to store it. It appears you are making multiple, contradictory claims.
Term papers?
Yes, two separate agencies have separate tasks that each involve firearms. And how exactly does that prove the NSA has the super secret list?
I guess if we all found out tomorrow that they do indeed have it all on record, some would just say that there’s nothing we can do about it anyway, so why worry? Not trying to be chicken little, just saying that it’s a very real possibility. I didn’t write the article in the OP, but I believe it has merit. And when you talk about 100% certainty and absolutes, let me just say I also believe it’s more probable than not.
Not accurate. Just answering you in kind, so if you think it doesn’t make sense, well...
You just have a very skewed sense of reading comprehension, in that you only read and see what fits your narrative. I’m sure you find it entertaining to a point, like a sudoku puzzle or something, but you’ve really accomplished nothing. You haven’t discredited the article, you haven’t proven the government is not compiling a list of gun owners in the US and you haven’t even enticed me to attempt to straighten out the mess of misinterpretation you’ve created here. It’s not worth it at all. You do make it easy for me to walk away from a discussion though. Rewarding actually. To clarify, it’s nice not talking to you.
No, we’re not, because there is no we. Feel free to carry on though. Don’t let me hold you up.You are correct. And you have not proven the government is compiling that list. You've shown it it possible with the current technology. But showing it can happen is not proof it is happening. So we're back where we've been, it's possible they are and it's possible they aren't.
No, we’re not, because there is no we. Feel free to carry on though. Don’t let me hold you up.
No, we’re not, because there is no we. Feel free to carry on though. Don’t let me hold you up.
Hmmm...we can't have a "we're not" if there's no we.
I would guess that info is stored in the same building that Snoden, described (Forgot what it was called) that stores records of ALL phone calls and text messages...
I don’t know Perez. Pretty much every time you try the same old pointless jabs I just shrug my shoulders and shake my head and wonder about your motive. It doesn’t offer anything at all to the conversation. I’m sure it serves your purpose but only yours. You may enjoy the constant bickering over nothing but it serves no real purpose. You put fort a consistent effort to keep the empty arguments going though, so I gotta believe it’s important to you, but I don’t believe the vast majority of folks come here to get their debate on. You can include me in that bunch.
So, I hope that about clears it up for you. Go get that last word in. I promise I won’t reply.
Not trying to be chicken little, just saying that it’s a very real possibility. I didn’t write the article in the OP, but I believe it has merit. And when you talk about 100% certainty and absolutes, let me just say I also believe it’s more probable than not.
https://youtu.be/uZvmftYHWKM
Jump to the 5:00 mark where he talks about the bill and NICS data. This is what they want. Trying to pass it into law. Sorry for folks who can deny something staring them in the face.
You are correct. And you have not proven the government is compiling that list. You've shown it it possible with the current technology. But showing it can happen is not proof it is happening. So we're back where we've been, it's possible they are and it's possible they aren't.
And if you look at the title of this thread, there’s a question mark on the end of it that’s been there from day one.I believe most people would agree there are those who would like to have a list of guns and gun owners. I am in that group. Where a lot of people differ is in the belief that list already exists. The desire and an attempt to create such a list does not mean that list already exists. It also doesn't mean the list does not exist.