Medical marijuana cardholders are banned from buying guns

[JoeLiberty]

Seriously man, stop dancing and answer legitimately.
Obviously you're not into pot, we get that but why would someone using Marijuana as prescribed/moderately, which would not produce hallucinations for the average person, why should they not be legally able to defend themselves?

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Bro, it clearly says right there in the 2nd Amendment: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed, unless you smoke marijuana. That's pretty clear.
Seriously though hallucinations? I think some folks here got their drug education from watching "reefer madness".

 

[GunRelated]

What's wrong Dave, too high to think of a distraction?

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[GunRelated]

Seriously man, stop dancing and answer legitimately.
Obviously you're not into pot, we get that but why would someone using Marijuana as prescribed/moderately, which would not produce hallucinations for the average person, why should they not be legally able to defend themselves?

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

I'll leave this here for you to reference since you might not can find it.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[whitsend]

Let's keep it civil.

http://www.bayoushooter.com/forums/misc.php?do=vsarules

FORUM RULES

Rule 1: No rudeness or personal attacks

While we appreciate passionate and informed discussion we will not allow rudeness, insulting posts, personal attacks, purposeless inflammatory posts, or trolling.

Rule 3: No argumentative and divisive behavior

Members who consistently post argumentative and divisive messages will be removed from the forums. *This is especially true in Law Enforcement threads. *Posts include bickering, arguing, generalizing, or denigrating LE service or citizen actions, will be deleted. *The moderating staff will be the sole decider of the tone/intent of a post. *Posts deemed to be in violation of our rules will be deleted and may result in infractions.

This rule is not meant to stifle the civil discussion of laws or other current issues relevant to gun owners, instead it is to allow these discussions to flourish as opposed to devolving.

 

[MrNiceGuy]

 

[GunRelated]

So, I think we can all agree that it was wrong for these people to have lost their right to legally defend themselves simply because they have a Marijuana prescription.
If you disagree, go ahead and leave us a post giving a legitimate reason why you think differently.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[Whitebread]

I wouldn't, because laws and stuff.

Is it just me or there sure are a bunch of outlaws on here that want to smoke weed and play with guns?

JR1572

Ever roll a stop sign because it would have been silly to stop when no one was around for miles? Speed down a street posted well below necissary? We are all outlaws to some degree and no I don't smoke weed and haven't in the last decade but it doesn't change the fact that the law is completely moronic. Its ok to smoke squares but not left handers what makes since about that? There is no medical benefit to cigs and a wealth of reasons not to, but they are still legal. I break stupid laws that get in my way I don't care to get high anymore so I mind old uncle sam on that one.

 

[Whitebread]

This ruling you guys are all getting fired up about effects CA, OR, and WA. That 9th circuit, as liberal and anti-police as it is, got it right this time.

If you're that sick and in that much pain, how can anyone effectively use a firearm? Anyone thought about that?

JR1572

How could someone that sick be expected to defend themselves without a firearm.

 

[DAVE_M]

How could someone that sick be expected to defend themselves without a firearm.

That answer goes along with the question "Do you really need medicinal marijuana?"

 

[JR1572]

Ever roll a stop sign because it would have been silly to stop when no one was around for miles? Speed down a street posted well below necissary? We are all outlaws to some degree and no I don't smoke weed and haven't in the last decade but it doesn't change the fact that the law is completely moronic. Its ok to smoke squares but not left handers what makes since about that? There is no medical benefit to cigs and a wealth of reasons not to, but they are still legal. I break stupid laws that get in my way I don't care to get high anymore so I mind old uncle sam on that one.

Committing a traffic violation is much less serious than possessing a CDS with a firearm. Apples and oranges.

Yes, I have violated traffic laws.

JR1572

 

[GunRelated]

How could someone that sick be expected to defend themselves without a firearm.

It's OK. We've put a different perspective into a few. Small steps for man and all...

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[JR1572]

How could someone that sick be expected to defend themselves without a firearm.

If someone is that sick shouldn't someone be caring for them?

JR1572

 

[GunRelated]

Not everyone that is in terrible pain is on their death bed or in hospice.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[GunRelated]

This conversation would be over if y'all would go back and answer my question(s).

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[JR1572]

This conversation would be over if y'all would go back and answer my question(s).

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

What's the question?

If you want me to answer a question in reference to one of my posts please quote the post. Thanks pal.

JR1572

 

[GunRelated]

That answer goes along with the question "Do you really need medicinal marijuana?"

There you are. Welcome back.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[GunRelated]

Seriously man, stop dancing and answer legitimately.
Obviously you're not into pot, we get that but why would someone using Marijuana as prescribed/moderately, which would not produce hallucinations for the average person, why should they not be legally able to defend themselves?

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[Whitebread]

If they are taking heavy medication that has the potential to cause hallucinations, I think it is unwise to give them a firearm.

Be fair here one you can't smoke enough pot to hallucinate. Not gonna happen. Yes thc can cause hallucinations but the amount of pot required to accomplish that couldnot be smoked fast enough it would require extracting the thc.

Two just you have beer and guns in your house doesn't you get hammered and got to blasting away.

Three a weed high dies fast if you were to compare sobering up from boozes and weed. You would be amazed how quickly you get strait from pot.

 

[JR1572]

There you are. Welcome back.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Like I said before, I have no issue with someone using medicinal marijuana for a medical issue. I have issue with people who use/abuse substances and possess firearms.

Hope that clears it up.

JR1572

 

[GunRelated]

Like I said before, I have no issue with someone using medicinal marijuana for a medical issue. I have issue with people who use/abuse substances and possess firearms.

Hope that clears it up.

JR1572

Ok, I understand that. To each their own and no problems with that. Now tell me why someone who, has a legitimate/legal reason, uses Marijuana... Why should they not be able to legally defend themselves?

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk