"Casual" Carry in a Vehicle

[chanteliz]

why are you so interested in this- geez I didn't come here to cause any trouble. If I have to prove everything I say here - it's like a damn court room. maybe this isn't the place I should mingle at all. this is definitely not a fun place to discuss anything.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[alpinehyperlite]

There is no such thing. There was a run of special agent badges, but they were given to people close to high ranking officials, and never went along side with a commission. So if someone ever try's to pass themselves off as a Special Agent with LSP and that's what their badge says, they are lying. It's one of those types of "get out if jail free" cards that are given to "important" people.

It's important to me because people claimin to be LEO and are not is a huge problem. Would you like to be pulled over by someone acting like a cop? It's nothing against you personally. It's about someone claiming he works for LSP and presents a badge saying so, when he doesn't.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[chanteliz]

Look like I said, it's not a Louisiana shield like the LSP carries. IDK what it is and I really don't care. He taught a very informative class and I figured LSP because that's what the certificate had. I don't care anymore. If you're a LSP why don't you care more about real issue vs who's carrying what and who is commissioned by whom. I really don't care. I saw a badge I assumed LSP... my fault. Happy?

 

[olivs260]

No one's saying your CHP class was invalid. But if someone is claiming to work for LSP and they don't, they frankly ought to be called out on it- IMHO, for what that's worth (and frankly in this case, that isn't all that much)

 

[chanteliz]

He didn't say he works for LSP, I saw his badge and assumed. I don't remember all that was on his badge except for seeing special agent. It is not shaped like a LSP badge (it was a shield not the state of LA). I assumed bc LSP was on my certificate. I really don't care.

 

[BeerManNOLA]

It was stated that he was teaching out of Shooters Club, which should be easy enough to contact for this person's contact info. They may even be able to clarify. Better to go this route than anymore personal interaction here (as evidenced above).

And, it's important in that if this teacher did misrepresent that qualification, he may have misrepresented others. It's just good practice to follow up on issues like this when they are found, as we don't want any bad press, such as a headline like "Hundreds of people are illegally carrying concealed weapons after having been duped by instructor" or something similar.

 

[chanteliz]

OMG... wow.

 

[alpinehyperlite]

It has been cleared up. It was a case of mistaken identity so to speak. It was thought that the LSP instructor number was a LSP trooper identification number. So all is well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[chanteliz]

I can't believe all of the commotion.... honestly ... just WOW.

I'm very sorry for any trouble I may have caused. I don't think this is the right discussion board for me to participate in. Most of you here seem to be hostile and argumentative. I'm just not interested in any of that.

Just remember this next time a new person pops up with information you may not know... that way you don't drive them away as well.

 

[alpinehyperlite]

Its a serious problem when people misrepresent themselves as something they are not. Especially when it involves Law Enforcement or firearms. This is a firearm forum. Anything that could damage gun rights here is discussed and corrected. The possibility if an instructor lying could cause serious damage. People here are passionate about certain things, the above posts show.
It was nothing about you personally, so I apologize if it came out that way, but wha was discussed could have been a serious problem.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Emperor]

I can't believe all of the commotion.... honestly ... just WOW.

I'm very sorry for any trouble I may have caused. I don't think this is the right discussion board for me to participate in. Most of you here seem to be hostile and argumentative. I'm just not interested in any of that.

Just remember this next time a new person pops up with information you may not know... that way you don't drive them away as well.

Don't you give in like that! That's one thing I can't stand is a person caving in to debate. Alpine is right, but you need to stay in there and represent your side.

Don't quit! That's the way this thing works. It has everything; heated debate, instructive teachings, informative subjects, and of course; inane silliness and comedy!

 

[madwabbit]

man. he should see some of our "best of bayoushooter" threads.

It sure didn't look like a personal attack, but when you state how great your instructor is/was, we get curious. Maybe I'd like to send him someone thats been asking me where to get licensed?

Don't default to "its a courtroom and a personal attack", because our default (at least mine) was "never heard of the guy. some new instructor worth looking at maybe... now how do I find him." when we look him up, he doesn't exist.

Miscommunication, nothing more.

 

[AustinBR]

Just brainstorming, but I don't believe they can force you to let them search your vehicle, right? So in essence they would be suspending/expelling you for refusing a search unless the firearm is in plain sight, correct?

They can't "force" you, per se, but they can kick you out for refusing to let them. So yes.

Don't you give in like that! That's one thing I can't stand is a person caving in to debate. Alpine is right, but you need to stay in there and represent your side.

Don't quit! That's the way this thing works. It has everything; heated debate, instructive teachings, informative subjects, and of course; inane silliness and comedy!

Bingo. This is a fun place. Some issues just are a little important. We wouldn't someone misrepresenting himself and causing trouble down the road. No one is pointing any fingers or being mean!

 

[MOTOR51]

HAHAHAHA!!!!!! YOU HAVENT SEEN ANYTHING YET.

Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk

 

[AustinBR]

HAHAHAHA!!!!!! YOU HAVENT SEEN ANYTHING YET.

Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk

Very very true.

 

[Robhic]

There is no such thing. There was a run of special agent badges, but they were given to people close to high ranking officials, and never went along side with a commission.

Years and years ago, my uncle was a LA senator. Just for kicks he got my father a "special agent" badge (no, I have NO idea why!) that was a small state of LA with "Special Agent" across it. My old man kept it in a jewelry box in the house and never used it or displayed it in any way. I always wanted it! After he died I have no idea what happened to it. Possibly my idiot brother (aka the Tomb Raider) took it but I haven't seen that thing since the 60's.

 

[dantheman]

Ok , let's argue about something else . I say that your vehicle is not an extension of your home . I've never seen any legal language that says it is .

 

[AustinBR]

REFER TO LA CODE RS 14:95

Read it all before you decide to carry while on school property either on yourself or in your vehicle.
(you can use Google for LA Codes)

Its not really up for debate. You can have your gun in your car while on school properly. Hell. I am in my car at LSU as I am typing this.

--Sent From My Galaxy S4

 

[AustinBR]

Ok , let's argue about something else . I say that your vehicle is not an extension of your home . I've never seen any legal language that says it is .

No where does the law say it is. But you can still keep a gun in your car in the state of louisiana unless you are in a few select places.

--Sent From My Galaxy S4

 

[charlie12]

Ok , let's argue about something else . I say that your vehicle is not an extension of your home . I've never seen any legal language that says it is .

I agree