If she was already dead, and then he shot her with the intent to kill her, is that murder? In most jurisdictions I don't know if it is. I think you actually have to kill someone, not shoot a dead body.
But yeah in this case you're probably right about proving premeditation.
I don't know, but forensics will shed light on that I guarantee it. If he in theory had shot her after she died, it'll be an argument that he was firing out of anger and not out of a perceived threat. I wouldn't want to be him because no matter how you spin this it ends up with him in the wrong. I'd say "attempted murder" more than "murder", because he didn't actually take life, but I don't have experience as a prosecutor. If we take away the "in theory" of this paragraph, its a moot point because he actually did kill her moments before and admitted to it to boot.
1911 posed a fantastic question though: do we want a society where if you break into someone's home, all bets are off? or vice versa: do we want a society where when someone breaks in your home, you had better deal with them justly and humanely lest you be sued or indicted?
either way this case is going to have repercussions imo
Last edited: