Seems like if steel were the issue, they would ban all steel-jacketed or core ammo because their backstop isn't rated against, it, not ban guns which aren't necessarily firing steel.
That said, it must be they want to 'ban' reckless or rowdy people' by banning the gun they use, instead. IIRC...
Well, there's GNU Cash, which free/open-source(obviously differs from shareware, but yeah).
'haven't used it personally, but just throwing it out there.
So, if I'm understanding correctly, the person in question is planning(?) on carrying a handgun to 'protect' himself against...I'm not even sure what, and he does not have the experience, training, or it looks like emotional state to protect himself properly.
That said, I would be more afraid...
Ironic. We can't expect people to conduct themselves in a respectful and direct/honest manner, and anyone who believes or desires the contrary is immediately being dishonest/holier-than-thou?
I guess the key in this particular venue is to stick to discussion about guns, self-defense, and such...
I'm new here; hopefully this kind of crap isn't too common. Oh well/'guess I'll see.
Addressing the topic, it seems like a 'warning shot', something typically frowned upon as a tactic(the prevailing approach being shoot to stop or kill, AFAIK), would be the ideal way to diffuse the situation...
What's this about a cop being able to immediately pick out who's in the right during the attack because the victim is, to paraphrase one post, white and surrounded by 'democrats'?
Am I interpreting that correctly or what?